14-03-2012, 08:44 PM
Exactly what i've been trying to explain to him. Underhand tactics to bully him into paying. Their response to the appeal was that he'd denied being the driver, he never did, he said he didn't know who it was at that time on that day. And it's not a Road Traffic Offence when on private land so section 143 (1) does not apply, he does not have to incriminate anyone and it's up to the company to prove it was him should they take it to court. Their useless wording of their appeal rejection and inability to read his appeal in full makes me wonder what "legal team" they actually have?
No doubt Mr Perkins in his lonely office preying on the unaware again. Don't know him? Google him.
No doubt Mr Perkins in his lonely office preying on the unaware again. Don't know him? Google him.
![[Image: signature_zps1a02ba79.jpg]](http://s1128.photobucket.com/user/martypellowe/media/signature_zps1a02ba79.jpg.html)