Posts: 7,347
Threads: 163
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
53
Location: Leeds
Car Model/Spec: 406 HDI
Thanks: 0
Given 18 thank(s) in 15 post(s)
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic...FVTS&mid=0
Was looking for some info on Saxo VTRs, came across this "mrconfused" lad, arguing that the less powerful VTR is obviously the better car compared to the VTS
Listen to da man, he has a superbike boy.
Posts: 511
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
2
Location: Scotland!
Car Model/Spec: 106 slo-nad
Thanks: 24
Given 7 thank(s) in 7 post(s)
(26-01-2014, 10:07 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic...FVTS&mid=0
Was looking for some info on Saxo VTRs, came across this "mrconfused" lad, arguing that the less powerful VTR is obviously the better car compared to the VTS
Listen to da man, he has a superbike boy.
Reminds me of a certain someone who thinks his "standard" VTR goes from 0-60 in 5.5 seconds. Hes a right idiot.
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Posts: 19,854
Threads: 581
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
195
Location: Bournemouth
Car Model/Spec: Supercharged 306 GTi6
Thanks: 36
Given 82 thank(s) in 78 post(s)
lol the 106 forum was full of them that thought their 106s were the quickest cars around. I remember one thread where a guy thought his cammed quicksilver kept up with his mates M3 until 110mph.
Team Eaton
1999 China Blue 306 GTi6 - Eaton Supercharged - 214.5bhp 181lbft
Posts: 7,347
Threads: 163
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
53
Location: Leeds
Car Model/Spec: 406 HDI
Thanks: 0
Given 18 thank(s) in 15 post(s)
It makes me laugh. I mean I'm considering a VTR because I've been offered a MINT one cheap, and because having driven them I know they're good fun with 100bhp in a 930kg car, but the VTS has more power and is therefore more fun. A VTR goes well and is nippy but not out and out fast like my 106 GTI. God I regret selling that...
Posts: 13,881
Threads: 476
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
81
Location: Ipswich
Car Model/Spec: 306 Rallye
Thanks: 4
Given 104 thank(s) in 102 post(s)
Is the 106gti comparable to the vtr or vts?
Posts: 19,854
Threads: 581
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
195
Location: Bournemouth
Car Model/Spec: Supercharged 306 GTi6
Thanks: 36
Given 82 thank(s) in 78 post(s)
(26-01-2014, 11:15 PM)SRowell Wrote: Is the 106gti comparable to the vtr or vts?
Its identical to the VTS. Just looks are different and thats it.
Team Eaton
1999 China Blue 306 GTi6 - Eaton Supercharged - 214.5bhp 181lbft
Posts: 13,881
Threads: 476
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
81
Location: Ipswich
Car Model/Spec: 306 Rallye
Thanks: 4
Given 104 thank(s) in 102 post(s)
(26-01-2014, 11:18 PM)Niall Wrote: (26-01-2014, 11:15 PM)SRowell Wrote: Is the 106gti comparable to the vtr or vts?
Its identical to the VTS. Just looks are different and thats it.
Yep knew they were the same and parts were swappable. Just wondered whether it was the r or the s that was the same performance. Cheers Niall.
Posts: 3,342
Threads: 151
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
14
Location: Rotherham
Car Model/Spec: 306 D-turbo
Thanks: 1
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
The gti is identical to the vts same engine different badge on rocker cover and a saxo is around £500 cheaper than the equivalent 106
Team Doesn't own a 306
Posts: 3,616
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
45
Thanks: 177
Given 28 thank(s) in 28 post(s)
My bro in law has a vts.. Very impressed with it, little pocket rocket!
Posts: 7,347
Threads: 163
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
53
Location: Leeds
Car Model/Spec: 406 HDI
Thanks: 0
Given 18 thank(s) in 15 post(s)
Good little cars. The VTR is decent as well, it has the 106 S2 Rallye engine so 0-60 in 9.1, not fast but enough to be fun. I'd go for a VTS or a 106 GTI if I was picking but a VTR has come in as part exchange at my mates dealership, totally standard, full Citroën history, 1 lady owner who traded it against a 208 GTi, 44k and apparently it's immaculate, he says I can have it for the £750 he gave for it.
Posts: 19,854
Threads: 581
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
195
Location: Bournemouth
Car Model/Spec: Supercharged 306 GTi6
Thanks: 36
Given 82 thank(s) in 78 post(s)
That sounds like a good price Liam. They do really seem to be holding their value (well what they have left anyway!)
Team Eaton
1999 China Blue 306 GTi6 - Eaton Supercharged - 214.5bhp 181lbft
Posts: 7,347
Threads: 163
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
53
Location: Leeds
Car Model/Spec: 406 HDI
Thanks: 0
Given 18 thank(s) in 15 post(s)
I've never had a car with anywhere near that mileage! It's no definite though, I'm still talking to James about buying his XM...
Posts: 2,636
Threads: 102
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
18
Location: Warwickshire
Car Model/Spec: Ph.1 Gti-6 63k
Thanks: 0
Given 22 thank(s) in 22 post(s)
I think the VTS has slightly different gear ratios to the 106 gti as well if I'm not mistaken?
Other than that, they are based off of the same platform and share common parts for everything but panels, trim and badges really.
This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted above as fact.
62k Diablo Phase 1 Gti-6: Project Thread
Posts: 4,566
Threads: 102
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
9
Location: Sunderland
Thanks: 60
Given 14 thank(s) in 14 post(s)
that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that.
what you want to do tho liam, if you get your hands on it, is gut it for the running gear etc, and drop the full works into a AX.
Posts: 7,347
Threads: 163
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
53
Location: Leeds
Car Model/Spec: 406 HDI
Thanks: 0
Given 18 thank(s) in 15 post(s)
(27-01-2014, 11:44 AM)RetroPug Wrote: I think the VTS has slightly different gear ratios to the 106 gti as well if I'm not mistaken?
Other than that, they are based off of the same platform and share common parts for everything but panels, trim and badges really.
It does mate, longer ratios.
(27-01-2014, 04:34 PM)procta Wrote: that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that.
what you want to do tho liam, if you get your hands on it, is gut it for the running gear etc, and drop the full works into a AX.
Nah, can't be arsed anymore! If I was gonna convert an AX I'd build another VTS, loved my old one.
Posts: 4,566
Threads: 102
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
9
Location: Sunderland
Thanks: 60
Given 14 thank(s) in 14 post(s)
(27-01-2014, 04:40 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: (27-01-2014, 11:44 AM)RetroPug Wrote: I think the VTS has slightly different gear ratios to the 106 gti as well if I'm not mistaken?
Other than that, they are based off of the same platform and share common parts for everything but panels, trim and badges really.
It does mate, longer ratios.
(27-01-2014, 04:34 PM)procta Wrote: that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that.
what you want to do tho liam, if you get your hands on it, is gut it for the running gear etc, and drop the full works into a AX.
Nah, can't be arsed anymore! If I was gonna convert an AX I'd build another VTS, loved my old one.
a sorry I thought you were meaning the VTS not the VTR,
Posts: 511
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
2
Location: Scotland!
Car Model/Spec: 106 slo-nad
Thanks: 24
Given 7 thank(s) in 7 post(s)
(27-01-2014, 04:34 PM)procta Wrote: that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that.
what you want to do tho liam, if you get your hands on it, is gut it for the running gear etc, and drop the full works into a AX.
(27-01-2014, 04:40 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: (27-01-2014, 11:44 AM)RetroPug Wrote: I think the VTS has slightly different gear ratios to the 106 gti as well if I'm not mistaken?
Other than that, they are based off of the same platform and share common parts for everything but panels, trim and badges really.
It does mate, longer ratios.
(27-01-2014, 04:34 PM)procta Wrote: that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that.
what you want to do tho liam, if you get your hands on it, is gut it for the running gear etc, and drop the full works into a AX.
Nah, can't be arsed anymore! If I was gonna convert an AX I'd build another VTS, loved my old one.
NEIN NEIN NEIN!
106 GTi and VTS gearboxes are EXACTLY the same. This has been covered 1000000000000 times.
If you're gonna use the "0-60 listed times are different argument"
Citroen did it with a driver only, car empty and half tank of fuel.
Peugeot, driver and passenger and full tank. That's what adds the extra second.
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Posts: 4,566
Threads: 102
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
9
Location: Sunderland
Thanks: 60
Given 14 thank(s) in 14 post(s)
what do you mean NEIN NEIN NEIN dropping a VTS lump in an AX is a must!
Posts: 511
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
2
Location: Scotland!
Car Model/Spec: 106 slo-nad
Thanks: 24
Given 7 thank(s) in 7 post(s)
27-01-2014, 05:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 27-01-2014, 05:57 PM by Martin306.)
(27-01-2014, 05:51 PM)procta Wrote: what do you mean NEIN NEIN NEIN dropping a VTS lump in an AX is a must!
I was responding to the MA gearbox noob (Liam)
Also, just to add.
1.4 quikky, 1.5D and VTR gearboxes are all the same ratios too, except the VTR has a slightly shorter first, and longer second. 3, 4 and 5th are shared though.
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Posts: 1,058
Threads: 18
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
10
Location: Wiltshire
Car Model/Spec: 3 x 205 GTi & 306 HDi
Thanks: 3
Given 17 thank(s) in 17 post(s)
27-01-2014, 06:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 27-01-2014, 06:02 PM by powerandtorque.)
They used the same box on a diesel as they did the VTR, including final drive?!
Christ, no wonder the VTR felt so long geared for what was billed as a warm/hot hatch...
1990 Peugeot 205 GTi 1.9 // 1991 Peugeot 205 GTi 1.9 16v // 1992 Peugeot 205 GTi 1.9 // 1999 Peugeot 306 HDi Estate
Posts: 511
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
2
Location: Scotland!
Car Model/Spec: 106 slo-nad
Thanks: 24
Given 7 thank(s) in 7 post(s)
27-01-2014, 06:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 27-01-2014, 06:05 PM by Martin306.)
(27-01-2014, 06:01 PM)powerandtorque Wrote: They used the same box on a diesel as they did the VTR, including final drive?!
Christ, no wonder the VTR felt so long geared for what was billed as a warm/hot hatch...
Aye, same FD (0.767 5th gear and 3.765FD from memory). Make it really good on fuel though since it's doing lower revs on a cruise
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Posts: 4,566
Threads: 102
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
9
Location: Sunderland
Thanks: 60
Given 14 thank(s) in 14 post(s)
Posts: 7,347
Threads: 163
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
53
Location: Leeds
Car Model/Spec: 406 HDI
Thanks: 0
Given 18 thank(s) in 15 post(s)
(27-01-2014, 05:49 PM)Martin306 Wrote: (27-01-2014, 04:34 PM)procta Wrote: that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that.
what you want to do tho liam, if you get your hands on it, is gut it for the running gear etc, and drop the full works into a AX.
(27-01-2014, 04:40 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: (27-01-2014, 11:44 AM)RetroPug Wrote: I think the VTS has slightly different gear ratios to the 106 gti as well if I'm not mistaken?
Other than that, they are based off of the same platform and share common parts for everything but panels, trim and badges really.
It does mate, longer ratios.
(27-01-2014, 04:34 PM)procta Wrote: that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that.
what you want to do tho liam, if you get your hands on it, is gut it for the running gear etc, and drop the full works into a AX.
Nah, can't be arsed anymore! If I was gonna convert an AX I'd build another VTS, loved my old one.
NEIN NEIN NEIN!
106 GTi and VTS gearboxes are EXACTLY the same. This has been covered 1000000000000 times.
If you're gonna use the "0-60 listed times are different argument"
Citroen did it with a driver only, car empty and half tank of fuel.
Peugeot, driver and passenger and full tank. That's what adds the extra second.
Actually, I didn't read that properly. I thought he meant VTR - VTS/GTi.
Congratulations, you win the gearbox knowledge category.
Posts: 511
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
2
Location: Scotland!
Car Model/Spec: 106 slo-nad
Thanks: 24
Given 7 thank(s) in 7 post(s)
(27-01-2014, 06:42 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: Actually, I didn't read that properly. I thought he meant VTR - VTS/GTi.
Congratulations, you win the gearbox knowledge category.
Don't try and hide it now, it's too late. u dun goofed
When should I expect my trophy in the post?
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Posts: 7,347
Threads: 163
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
53
Location: Leeds
Car Model/Spec: 406 HDI
Thanks: 0
Given 18 thank(s) in 15 post(s)
(27-01-2014, 06:47 PM)Martin306 Wrote: (27-01-2014, 06:42 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: Actually, I didn't read that properly. I thought he meant VTR - VTS/GTi.
Congratulations, you win the gearbox knowledge category.
Don't try and hide it now, it's too late. u dun goofed
When should I expect my trophy in the post?
If by trophy you mean dog turd, tomorrow
Posts: 4,566
Threads: 102
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
9
Location: Sunderland
Thanks: 60
Given 14 thank(s) in 14 post(s)
(27-01-2014, 06:50 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: (27-01-2014, 06:47 PM)Martin306 Wrote: (27-01-2014, 06:42 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: Actually, I didn't read that properly. I thought he meant VTR - VTS/GTi.
Congratulations, you win the gearbox knowledge category.
Don't try and hide it now, it's too late. u dun goofed
When should I expect my trophy in the post?
If by trophy you mean dog turd, tomorrow
give him a custom title for his trouble liam
|