![]() |
A troll to laugh at - Printable Version +- 306oc - Peugeot 306 Owners Club & Forum (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum) +-- Forum: General (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: The Couch (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: A troll to laugh at (/showthread.php?tid=20831) |
A troll to laugh at - THE_Liam - 26-01-2014 http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=226&t=194541&mid=0&i=100&nmt=Citroen+Saxo+VTR%2FVTS&mid=0 Was looking for some info on Saxo VTRs, came across this "mrconfused" lad, arguing that the less powerful VTR is obviously the better car compared to the VTS ![]() Listen to da man, he has a superbike boy. RE: A troll to laugh at - Martin306 - 26-01-2014 (26-01-2014, 10:07 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=226&t=194541&mid=0&i=100&nmt=Citroen+Saxo+VTR%2FVTS&mid=0 Reminds me of a certain someone who thinks his "standard" VTR goes from 0-60 in 5.5 seconds. Hes a right idiot. RE: A troll to laugh at - Niall - 26-01-2014 lol the 106 forum was full of them that thought their 106s were the quickest cars around. I remember one thread where a guy thought his cammed quicksilver kept up with his mates M3 until 110mph. RE: A troll to laugh at - THE_Liam - 26-01-2014 It makes me laugh. I mean I'm considering a VTR because I've been offered a MINT one cheap, and because having driven them I know they're good fun with 100bhp in a 930kg car, but the VTS has more power and is therefore more fun. A VTR goes well and is nippy but not out and out fast like my 106 GTI. God I regret selling that... RE: A troll to laugh at - Eeyore - 26-01-2014 Is the 106gti comparable to the vtr or vts? RE: A troll to laugh at - Niall - 26-01-2014 (26-01-2014, 11:15 PM)SRowell Wrote: Is the 106gti comparable to the vtr or vts? Its identical to the VTS. Just looks are different and thats it. RE: A troll to laugh at - Eeyore - 26-01-2014 (26-01-2014, 11:18 PM)Niall Wrote:(26-01-2014, 11:15 PM)SRowell Wrote: Is the 106gti comparable to the vtr or vts? Yep knew they were the same and parts were swappable. Just wondered whether it was the r or the s that was the same performance. Cheers Niall. RE: A troll to laugh at - Danny2009 - 27-01-2014 The gti is identical to the vts same engine different badge on rocker cover and a saxo is around £500 cheaper than the equivalent 106 RE: A troll to laugh at - 1616six - 27-01-2014 My bro in law has a vts.. Very impressed with it, little pocket rocket! RE: A troll to laugh at - THE_Liam - 27-01-2014 Good little cars. The VTR is decent as well, it has the 106 S2 Rallye engine so 0-60 in 9.1, not fast but enough to be fun. I'd go for a VTS or a 106 GTI if I was picking but a VTR has come in as part exchange at my mates dealership, totally standard, full Citroën history, 1 lady owner who traded it against a 208 GTi, 44k and apparently it's immaculate, he says I can have it for the £750 he gave for it. RE: A troll to laugh at - Niall - 27-01-2014 That sounds like a good price Liam. They do really seem to be holding their value (well what they have left anyway!) RE: A troll to laugh at - THE_Liam - 27-01-2014 I've never had a car with anywhere near that mileage! It's no definite though, I'm still talking to James about buying his XM... RE: A troll to laugh at - RetroPug - 27-01-2014 I think the VTS has slightly different gear ratios to the 106 gti as well if I'm not mistaken? Other than that, they are based off of the same platform and share common parts for everything but panels, trim and badges really. RE: A troll to laugh at - procta - 27-01-2014 that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that. what you want to do tho liam, if you get your hands on it, is gut it for the running gear etc, and drop the full works into a AX. Re: RE: A troll to laugh at - THE_Liam - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 11:44 AM)RetroPug Wrote: I think the VTS has slightly different gear ratios to the 106 gti as well if I'm not mistaken? It does mate, longer ratios. (27-01-2014, 04:34 PM)procta Wrote: that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that. Nah, can't be arsed anymore! If I was gonna convert an AX I'd build another VTS, loved my old one. RE: A troll to laugh at - procta - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 04:40 PM)THE_Liam Wrote:(27-01-2014, 11:44 AM)RetroPug Wrote: I think the VTS has slightly different gear ratios to the 106 gti as well if I'm not mistaken? a sorry I thought you were meaning the VTS not the VTR, RE: A troll to laugh at - Martin306 - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 04:34 PM)procta Wrote: that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that. (27-01-2014, 04:40 PM)THE_Liam Wrote:(27-01-2014, 11:44 AM)RetroPug Wrote: I think the VTS has slightly different gear ratios to the 106 gti as well if I'm not mistaken? NEIN NEIN NEIN! 106 GTi and VTS gearboxes are EXACTLY the same. This has been covered 1000000000000 times. ![]() If you're gonna use the "0-60 listed times are different argument" Citroen did it with a driver only, car empty and half tank of fuel. Peugeot, driver and passenger and full tank. That's what adds the extra second. RE: A troll to laugh at - procta - 27-01-2014 what do you mean NEIN NEIN NEIN ![]() RE: A troll to laugh at - Martin306 - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 05:51 PM)procta Wrote: what do you mean NEIN NEIN NEIN I was responding to the MA gearbox noob (Liam) ![]() Also, just to add. 1.4 quikky, 1.5D and VTR gearboxes are all the same ratios too, except the VTR has a slightly shorter first, and longer second. 3, 4 and 5th are shared though. ![]() RE: A troll to laugh at - powerandtorque - 27-01-2014 They used the same box on a diesel as they did the VTR, including final drive?! Christ, no wonder the VTR felt so long geared for what was billed as a warm/hot hatch... ![]() RE: A troll to laugh at - Martin306 - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 06:01 PM)powerandtorque Wrote: They used the same box on a diesel as they did the VTR, including final drive?! Aye, same FD (0.767 5th gear and 3.765FD from memory). Make it really good on fuel though since it's doing lower revs on a cruise ![]() RE: A troll to laugh at - procta - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 05:56 PM)Martin306 Wrote:(27-01-2014, 05:51 PM)procta Wrote: what do you mean NEIN NEIN NEIN good, as I was going to say, go and put the kettle on. ![]() Re: RE: A troll to laugh at - THE_Liam - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 05:49 PM)Martin306 Wrote:(27-01-2014, 04:34 PM)procta Wrote: that made me laugh, liam! I love threads like that, when people bull shit on like that. Actually, I didn't read that properly. I thought he meant VTR - VTS/GTi. Congratulations, you win the gearbox knowledge category. RE: A troll to laugh at - Martin306 - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 06:42 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: Actually, I didn't read that properly. I thought he meant VTR - VTS/GTi. Don't try and hide it now, it's too late. u dun goofed When should I expect my trophy in the post? Re: RE: A troll to laugh at - THE_Liam - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 06:47 PM)Martin306 Wrote:(27-01-2014, 06:42 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: Actually, I didn't read that properly. I thought he meant VTR - VTS/GTi. If by trophy you mean dog turd, tomorrow ![]() RE: A troll to laugh at - procta - 27-01-2014 (27-01-2014, 06:50 PM)THE_Liam Wrote:(27-01-2014, 06:47 PM)Martin306 Wrote:(27-01-2014, 06:42 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: Actually, I didn't read that properly. I thought he meant VTR - VTS/GTi. give him a custom title for his trouble liam |