Over boosting ???

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Over boosting ???
#1
I've finally sorted my problem out with this under boosting issue but now I have it boosting at 26 psi when in 4th with my foot down is that too much so should I turn it down a little ?? If feels like it's got not to give but it's missing something and I don't no what it is ??
Reply
Thanks given by:
#2
No such thing as "over boost" on an XUD.

Man the f*ck up!
Supercharged GTi6 Build
S14 Zenki Build
[Image: signature.png]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#3
(21-09-2013, 01:08 PM)silverzx Wrote: No such thing as "over boost" on an XUD.

Man the f*ck up!

Hahahaha just read the title and in my head said theres no such thing and you beat me to it!
Doesnt even own a 306.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#4
(21-09-2013, 01:00 PM)Dan306DT Wrote: I have it boosting at 26 psi when in 4th with my foot down is that too much so should I turn it down a little ?? If feels like it's got not to give but it's missing something and I don't no what it is ??

yeah its called 5th gear Tongue
00' 106 Indy - Moonstone - Sold
97' 106 XT 1.6 - Mayerling Green - Swapped
95' 306 P1 DT - Onyx - Scrapped
97' 306 P2 DT - Silver - Scrapped
97' 306 P2 DT - Onyx - SORN awaiting scrap
Reply
Thanks given by:
#5
If you have boost, and no poke, you need more smoke.

That worked for me on the 405 I had anyway Tongue

What's it like in other gears?
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#6
There's smoke and some poke fuel pumps up as much as it will go xx
Reply
Thanks given by:
#7
(21-09-2013, 01:10 PM)adamm306 Wrote:
(21-09-2013, 01:00 PM)Dan306DT Wrote: I have it boosting at 26 psi when in 4th with my foot down is that too much so should I turn it down a little ?? If feels like it's got not to give but it's missing something and I don't no what it is ??

yeah its called 5th gear Tongue

as I said dump the clutch move to 5th and put your foot down again and tell us the results Tongue
00' 106 Indy - Moonstone - Sold
97' 106 XT 1.6 - Mayerling Green - Swapped
95' 306 P1 DT - Onyx - Scrapped
97' 306 P2 DT - Silver - Scrapped
97' 306 P2 DT - Onyx - SORN awaiting scrap
Reply
Thanks given by:
#8
29 psi haha
Reply
Thanks given by:
#9
whats wrong?!

Im confused Huh
Wishes for more power...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#10
(21-09-2013, 03:55 PM)Dan306DT Wrote: 29 psi haha

*facepalm*

I think they meant, does the car start accelerating again. lol

As in, you're revving it too hard. In diesel, revs are bad. Boost, torque and low revs are good Big Grin
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#11
(21-09-2013, 04:28 PM)Martin306 Wrote:
(21-09-2013, 03:55 PM)Dan306DT Wrote: 29 psi haha

*facepalm*

I think they meant, does the car start accelerating again. lol

As in, you're revving it too hard. In diesel, revs are bad. Boost, torque and low revs are good Big Grin

Revving a diesel hard isn't that bad!

@op. 26 is OK, its at the limits
[Image: IMG_20130925_181339_zps95df48fa.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#12
(21-09-2013, 05:26 PM)4WayDiablo Wrote:
(21-09-2013, 04:28 PM)Martin306 Wrote:
(21-09-2013, 03:55 PM)Dan306DT Wrote: 29 psi haha

*facepalm*

I think they meant, does the car start accelerating again. lol

As in, you're revving it too hard. In diesel, revs are bad. Boost, torque and low revs are good Big Grin

Revving a diesel hard isn't that bad!

@op. 26 is OK, its at the limits

True, but it's not that efficient? Saying that, my NAD got to 5000rpm on the rollers and the HP still hadn't peaked. Got to 61hp. Tongue
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#13
if its burning fuel cleanly and continuing to make power....then its efficient
Wishes for more power...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#14
(21-09-2013, 10:09 PM)Piggy Wrote: if its burning fuel cleanly and continuing to make power....then its efficient

We're talking about XUDs here Tongue I meant generally. Big Grin
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#15
If you don't need all the boost to burn all the fuel you're supplying, then more boost than required places more strain on the turbo and intercooling system... Also the pumping losses of the engine having to compress even more air in the cylinders is kinda pointless... Turn it down to the sweet spot of no smoke, but not higher than it need be.
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. Wink
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#16
(22-09-2013, 08:41 AM)Martin306 Wrote:
(21-09-2013, 10:09 PM)Piggy Wrote: if its burning fuel cleanly and continuing to make power....then its efficient

We're talking about XUDs here Tongue I meant generally. Big Grin

thats a pretty general rule to be honest.

people would say an evo8 that produces 400bhp is really inefficient...

well 25mpg isnt great...but its efficient when you consider the amount of power it produces for the fuel it uses
Wishes for more power...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#17
(22-09-2013, 08:40 PM)Piggy Wrote: thats a pretty general rule to be honest.

people would say an evo8 that produces 400bhp is really inefficient...

well 25mpg isnt great...but its efficient when you consider the amount of power it produces for the fuel it uses

It's not 25mpg when it's producing 400hp though, so it is inefficient?

An Aston Martin can do 25mpg and produce the same power. (6.0 V12)

Not a valid argument, but the Aston would probably be more efficient at high rpms than an evo producing the same power. I go off topic no more. Tongue
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#18
exactly. so aston have to use 3 times as many cylinders and 3 times as much capacity to get the same power.

an evo isnt a great example to be honest...more modern turbo petrols and diesels would be better to demonstrate but its still valid
Wishes for more power...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#19
(22-09-2013, 09:43 PM)Piggy Wrote: exactly. so aston have to use 3 times as many cylinders and 3 times as much capacity to get the same power.

an evo isnt a great example to be honest...more modern turbo petrols and diesels would be better to demonstrate but its still valid

Trust me, NA power delivery is so much better, 12 cylinders sounds better too, less stress on engine parts as well so longer life Big Grin

Every car should be a V12.
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#20
(23-09-2013, 07:33 PM)Martin306 Wrote: Every car should be a V12.

This^
Reply
Thanks given by:
#21
(23-09-2013, 07:33 PM)Martin306 Wrote:
(22-09-2013, 09:43 PM)Piggy Wrote: exactly. so aston have to use 3 times as many cylinders and 3 times as much capacity to get the same power.

an evo isnt a great example to be honest...more modern turbo petrols and diesels would be better to demonstrate but its still valid

Trust me, NA power delivery is so much better, 12 cylinders sounds better too, less stress on engine parts as well so longer life Big Grin

Every car should be a V12.

but consider the price!!

can you get a v12 vantage or db9 for 7grand!?
Wishes for more power...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#22
(23-09-2013, 08:07 PM)Piggy Wrote:
(23-09-2013, 07:33 PM)Martin306 Wrote:
(22-09-2013, 09:43 PM)Piggy Wrote: exactly. so aston have to use 3 times as many cylinders and 3 times as much capacity to get the same power.

an evo isnt a great example to be honest...more modern turbo petrols and diesels would be better to demonstrate but its still valid

Trust me, NA power delivery is so much better, 12 cylinders sounds better too, less stress on engine parts as well so longer life Big Grin

Every car should be a V12.

but consider the price!!

can you get a v12 vantage or db9 for 7grand!?

You might get a DB7 for that if you know where to look Wink Or a Jaguar XJ-S with IDF Weber (same car but SOHC)

Anyways, I'll post no more. I'm trying to stay away from spamming. Rofl
A moments silence please, for our brothers in the NAD-zone.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#23
nah I spam till get told off!!!

db7s are pretty...but just pretty xjs's. which are a rubbish car imo. And I love jags! lol
Wishes for more power...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#24
(23-09-2013, 09:02 PM)Piggy Wrote: nah I spam till get told off!!!

db7s are pretty...but just pretty xjs's. which are a rubbish car imo. And I love fags! lol

Bit off topic?! Wink
Reply
Thanks given by:
#25
(23-09-2013, 07:33 PM)Martin306 Wrote:
(22-09-2013, 09:43 PM)Piggy Wrote: exactly. so aston have to use 3 times as many cylinders and 3 times as much capacity to get the same power.

an evo isnt a great example to be honest...more modern turbo petrols and diesels would be better to demonstrate but its still valid

Trust me, NA power delivery is so much better,

I don't trust you in the slightest!
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. Wink
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#26
(22-09-2013, 08:11 PM)Ruan Wrote: If you don't need all the boost to burn all the fuel you're supplying, then more boost than required places more strain on the turbo and intercooling system... Also the pumping losses of the engine having to compress even more air in the cylinders is kinda pointless... Turn it down to the sweet spot of no smoke, but not higher than it need be.

Now you have said that how is a td04 @25psi with a welded wastegate and 9mm bosch?
Reply
Thanks given by:


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Lucas K14 Boosting 2 Bar daveylennon93 9 3,511 01-01-2015, 01:42 PM
Last Post: daveylennon93
  top mount td04 not boosting DagDag53 24 5,707 04-12-2014, 09:24 PM
Last Post: daniel.mountain.7
  XUD *over boosting* ? ADV_93 6 2,834 01-08-2014, 08:21 AM
Last Post: Ruan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)