22-03-2012, 10:29 PM
Maybe someone can explain this to me..
It clearly wasn't Scott's fault, and its the other party who will be paying all damages.. Why do they get to decide if it is a write off or not? Is Scott not reasonably allowed to demand that his car is fixed? Or is the calculation based on the value of the car which Scott declared on his insurance?
I've not been in an accident myself, touch wood, but if I was and it wasn't my fault, I would like to think I have some grounds to refuse them just writing if off?
If I'm spouting BS please correct me someone :-)
It clearly wasn't Scott's fault, and its the other party who will be paying all damages.. Why do they get to decide if it is a write off or not? Is Scott not reasonably allowed to demand that his car is fixed? Or is the calculation based on the value of the car which Scott declared on his insurance?
I've not been in an accident myself, touch wood, but if I was and it wasn't my fault, I would like to think I have some grounds to refuse them just writing if off?
If I'm spouting BS please correct me someone :-)
Captain Standard