HDI Lowered

[Scottp68877]

Hello I'm fairly new to the forum and just wondering if anyone has a clue how many nicks this 306 is lowered by? Also would they be 60mm coilovers/lowering springs in the front? [attachment=19451]

[1616six]

Way, way too many 'Nicks'.

Looks photoshopped in fact.

Coilovers aren't set MM, probably saxo springs with a coil cut off.

It's broken, don't buy it if you haven't already.

Ps. are you from N.I by any chance?

[Scottp68877]

Oh ok, no I'm not actually trying to buy it, A friend just said that it was 3 nicks and I was convinced it wasn't [SMILING FACE WITH SMILING EYES] would you have any pictures of ones that are 3 nicks by any chance would love to prove him wrong [SMILING FACE WITH OPEN MOUTH] no I'm from R.o.i

[1616six]

I don't I'm afraid, problem is 'Nicks' is the incorrect way of lowering and is frowned upon.

It's certainly more than three 'Nicks' though

For reference, here's a picture of three 'Nicks'

[cully]

nice edit

[Scottp68877]

I don't I'm afraid, problem is 'Nicks' is the incorrect way of lowering and is frowned upon.

It's certainly more than three 'Nicks' though

For reference, here's a picture of three 'Nicks'

Haha I'll definitely remember that know so what is the right way most guides I find seem to be on about nicks or is that just an irish thing ?

[1616six]

Removing the torsion bars is the correct way, the notch method supposedly puts more strain on the bearings & is generally considered the wrong way to do it. There won't be any guides on here showing the notch method.

[bashbarnard]

Its a pikey way in most people opinons. You cant get a decent adjustment. Your meant to draw the torsion bars out rather than bang the trailing arms out. Its a pain but gives more accurate results

[Eeyore]

Definitely a NI job. Thats way too low. Lowering it via the nick method is the wrong way to do it. If you do it properly you can set it to however low you want!

Id say that was 3 nicks though...

[Scottp68877]

Thanks a lot for all the replies I know some of them can be ridiculously low.. What would ye recommend would be the lowest you could go before it becomes impractical?

[cully]

a lot depends on what you plan on doing with the car

driving in fields you may want to raise it
driving on track you may want it lowered
driving on the road over sppedbumps std

you get the idea
end of its your choice

[Scottp68877]

I suppose I'll be driving it mainly on normal/back roads so I wouldn't be able to lower it much

[Eeyore]

so i think to keep it looking balanced the rear is often 10-20mm lower than the front.

So ive got a 60mm drop at the front but about 70mm at the back.

[Scottp68877]

so i think to keep it looking balanced the rear is often 10-20mm lower than the front.

So ive got a 60mm drop at the front but about 70mm at the back.

Is that not really low? Any pics of it so I can get an idea

[E_KEL95]

Looks like 3 maybe 4 nicks at the back, mines was 3 with cyclones and it wasn't as low at the back.

[Eeyore]

so i think to keep it looking balanced the rear is often 10-20mm lower than the front.

So ive got a 60mm drop at the front but about 70mm at the back.

Is that not really low? Any pics of it so I can get an idea

its on coilovers now but it has been on 40mm and 60mm springs. Also im on 15s. The wheels will be much more up in the arches with 17s.



and then look how low it is when you put it all underload round a corner. It really does depend on what spring rates and torsion bars youre running as to how low you can actually go. Im fine with the majority of speed bumps.



look at this thread... lots of pictures of lowered cars all with the details.

http://306oc.co.uk/forum/thread-1143.html