Parking Eye issued a "fine"

[ginge191]

Ok, so update on this.

Sent a letter requesting numerous data from them

As the registered keeper, I have received your parking invoice which of course, I decline your invitation to pay. I wish to invoke your appeals process, since all liability to your company is denied on the following basis:

1) The amount being claimed is not a genuine pre-estimate of loss to your company or the landowner
2) Your signage does not comply with your Accredited Trade Association (ATA) Code of Practice and was not sufficiently prominent to create any contract
3) You are not the landowner and do not have the standing to offer contracts nor to bring a claim for trespass

Following a recent letter I received notifying the driver of the vehicle to pay the amount for either not purchasing a ticket or for staying longer than the purchased ticket. No driver can be held liable or linked to the driving of the car specified registration **** *** nor is there an obligation to provide the drivers name.

In response to this, I ask for ANPR calibration data for the date specified with relative information linking to NPIA (2009) rules and regulations; specifically section 1, note 1.4 or similar.

Furthermore, the stated cost neither reflects the loss of potential revenue for the time specified 17:13:21 - 17:43:46 of 30 minutes.

In addition, the use terminology PCN, Penalty Charge Notice not only illusions the fact this is neither a legal binding fine nor that this is issued on behalf of the police or local authority but moreover suggests the former fact it is an invoice.

Also, could you provide written confirmation from the land owner evidencing the agreement that Parking Eye are responsible for provision of fees and charges in relation to loss of potential revenue and an agreement with the land owner of bills and charges which are issued.
I believe that you do not have a case against me to claim any form of payment as you request and as such, unless you can provide me with the relevant details i have requested above in full, I assume your letter to be no more than a speculative invoice which i will not pay. Furthermore, if you continue to contact me requesting me to pay this invoice, i will take action to claim back my expenses of time taken to deal with this matter including my time (Currently charged at £35.00 per hour), any materials and any data or phone costs.

In summary, i request your next contact to contain either the above requested items or a confirmation that you will no longer be contacting me regarding this matter.

Got this reply



Now i didn't say "I wasn't the driver" i said i legally i am not obliged to say who is driving.

Now there's the

This Act includes Section 172:
"the person keeping the vehicle shall give such information as to the identity of the driver as he may be required to give by or on behalf of a chief officer of police"

clearly this law does not apply to parking eye. This will be quoted in the next reply.

Anyone have any idea's - obviously they are providing nothing of which was requested so i'm tempted to reply with the similar as before and state that any further correspondence if not the above will be seen as harassment?

I've had a look through pepipoo.com but it only really gived advice and information with regards to REAL parking tickets and REAL fines..