Post 0-60 30-70 times

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post 0-60 30-70 times
#1
As above im just interested to see the differences in times with different combinations

post car as well e.g. 306or 205

The reason behind this is that i've just finished my 205 1.6 gti project and im unsure of which route to go down with engines, ive been thinking of a gti-6 conversion,vts box and vts quick rack with 283mm brake setup,

or going down the route of a xud with td04,bosch(160-170bhp) with vts rack
Reply
Thanks given by:
#2
Haven't actually timed mine. But I know that it's shit lol
[Image: 20A1806D-891D-40FB-BD52-AD519177A607-734...391753.jpg]
TEAM CONROD SHITTING RALLYE!
Reply
Thanks given by:
#3
Same old story as with the 306's. both equal ish when the XUD has a bigger blower. Down side is they are like playing with a loaded gun but still return 50MPG the petrol on the other hand with make good power all day long and be reliable but almost half the miles per gallon.
I know which one I'd prefer simply because of running costs. I reckon mine is in the mid to low 6 seconds to 60 in the dry but havnt officially timed it yet.
Stage 2 XUD Sedan
Reply
Thanks given by:
#4
well that's my concern with the petrol(mpg) its no fun pegging money into the tank, build costs not a concern either within reason, if I had a similar power output and high mpg with the xud

on the other hand would I be destroying a good example of a gti (which it is)

how does yours compare to a gti-6 205(if you have ever came across one)

have you ever driven a gti 205 and handling wise, does the xud's weight effect it much?
Reply
Thanks given by:
#5
I've been in convoy with 4x GTI 6 205's when I was running a stock turbo and they pulled from me but not loads.
I get your point about ruining it but its improving it in reality!

I've never drive a GTI but mine being an original Dturbo it cam with a softer GTI set up and the weight difference in minimal, pretty much identical except one has a turbo and injector pump. Much lighter than the '6 lumps either way.
Stage 2 XUD Sedan
Reply
Thanks given by:
#6
I would have thought an xud would have been heaver than a gti-6,

Basically I could live with it being a bit slower than a gti-6, once it was quicker than a 1.9 8v, over the past few months I've been wondering about what engine route i'd go down it as I tidied up other bits on the car

I was thinking of a basic xud setup t25,td04 and supporting pump mods, oil cooler, maybe a fmic
Reply
Thanks given by:
#7
9mm pump, larger turbo and possibly a FMIC or decent cooling to the TMIC and you should see 160+ bhp easily!
Stage 2 XUD Sedan
Reply
Thanks given by:
#8
306 - XUD9, GT2052V, TMIC, W/M Injection

30-70 - 5.3s
0-60 - 6.1s

With regards to the XUD changing handling - you realise a XUD is within about 2kg of a 1.9 8v and lighter than a GTi6 by about 40kg...
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. Wink
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#9
(24-07-2013, 07:47 PM)Ruan Wrote: 306 - XUD9, GT2052V, TMIC, W/M Injection

30-70 - 5.3s
0-60 - 6.1s

With regards to the XUD changing handling - you realise a XUD is within about 2kg of a 1.9 8v and lighter than a GTi6 by about 40kg...

I didn't until strictly derv posted above, Just assumed it would have been heavier, 40kg heavier didn't think they were that much heavier

Just after getting my friends 205 on the road this evening 1.9td bosch and t2 1.8 box, goes well enough, needs pump work, 1.8 box is way too short IMO plans for the weekend is gov mod, get a boost gauge on and give her some fuel and boost plus an axle. haha

Little does he know shes going to be my test project..haha
Reply
Thanks given by:
#10
The GTi engine is twin cam and has a cast head, plus the manifolds weigh a tonne too. Yeah the XUD has a turbo but nothing compared to the likes of the GTi exhaust mani.
[Image: signature_zps1a02ba79.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  50-80 acceleration times. daveylennon93 17 3,844 17-07-2014, 08:59 AM
Last Post: kelvsere
  30-60mph in 3rd times?? Chris_90 139 56,987 22-04-2014, 10:00 PM
Last Post: daveylennon93
  Sad Times Are Sad c.gerrard 15 3,269 30-11-2013, 08:51 AM
Last Post: darrenjlobb

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)