mk4 golf gti

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
mk4 golf gti
#1
hi guys just wondering what bhp the mk4 gti golf 8v was? my mates thinking of swapping his DT for one so was just wondering if anyone knew?

thanks ash
Official Team Go-NAD fan club
Reply
Thanks given by:
#2
Shit mate, 115bhp or 1.8 20v are 150bhp
[Image: A1A3B2B1-9269-463A-9F21-2ABF4CE9BEAC-165...A3B3F7.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#3
112. Rediculously underpowered...

How can you call that a GTi? I really don't know...
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. Wink
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#4
Mk4 2.0 8v is 115bhp. They are stupidly slow and guzzle fuel for a laugh. I had a bora with same lump. The shitist engine ever!

Avoid!
Reply
Thanks given by:
#5
2.0l are epicly shite, seriously 115bhp out of a 2.0L power to weight is amazingly poor!

He will regret it no end!

Words really cant discribe how i feel about this piss poor attempt of and engine!

[Image: DSC_0190-Copy_zpsf093f84d.jpg]
Member of 99% warning or your nothing club!

Reply
Thanks given by:
#6
I had a race with a lad from work, honestly I may aswell have raced a saxo VTR!
Not worthy of GTI badge at all! It's a joke!
[Image: A1A3B2B1-9269-463A-9F21-2ABF4CE9BEAC-165...A3B3F7.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#7
lol at the comments above!

All true though. The mk4 Golf was also hideously heavy to boot, so the wet engines didn't exactly have it easy!
'99 Ph3 Diablo Gti(Victor) Dead
Astor 'X' 4 GTi6-6 - SOLD! Sad
'08 LY Renault Megane RS 230 F1 Team R26 - GONE
'56 BMW Z4 Coupe 3.0si Sport - SCHWIIIING!
Reply
Thanks given by:
#8
(27-10-2012, 06:05 PM)Oil-burner Wrote: I had a race with a lad from work, honestly I may aswell have raced a saxo VTR!
Not worthy of GTI badge at all! It's a joke!

Pppff i recon a vtr would ra*e it you know

[Image: DSC_0190-Copy_zpsf093f84d.jpg]
Member of 99% warning or your nothing club!

Reply
Thanks given by:
#9
Power to weight a 2001+ (100bhp model) saxo would wipe the floor with one!
[Image: A1A3B2B1-9269-463A-9F21-2ABF4CE9BEAC-165...A3B3F7.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#10
(27-10-2012, 04:52 PM)Ruan Wrote: 112. Rediculously underpowered...

How can you call that a GTi? I really don't know...

I don't think you can, but you kind of had to put a GTI badge on it in order to sell any...
Disclaimer: The above is not to be taken to heart and is probably a joke, grow up you big girl.
[Image: Sig500x130.png]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#11
2.0 8v GTI was ok in my stripped out 850/900kg Ibiza but anything bigger/heavier and its a no goer.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#12
well i tried explaining they were much cop to him and even though his DT is only on a lucas fmic and t2 still a hell of a lot quick due to 53 more ft/lb torque 10bhp more and less weight
Official Team Go-NAD fan club
Reply
Thanks given by:
#13
Keep the dt, it's funny laughing at the Dubber wannabes in there mk4 shitboxes!
[Image: A1A3B2B1-9269-463A-9F21-2ABF4CE9BEAC-165...A3B3F7.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#14
(27-10-2012, 10:15 PM)Oil-burner Wrote: Keep the dt, it's funny laughing at the Dubber wannabes in there mk4 shitboxes!

What's funnier than that is pulling up to the lights, him looking at you then looking at the dturbo badge on the side then laughing...
Then him watching as the dturbo easily pulls away from him :-( DTurbo
[Image: IMG_20130925_181339_zps95df48fa.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#15
dturbo over what sounds to be a crummy golf!
Reply
Thanks given by:
#16
I had a mk3 with that engine, it wasn't slow but it wasn't fast either by a long shot. Imagine that with an extra 200kg...
[Image: tapatalk_1427020983519_zpsnwvozlhb.jpeg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#17
(28-10-2012, 07:08 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: I had a mk3 with that engine, it wasn't slow but it wasn't fast either by a long shot. Imagine that with an extra 200kg...

Not the same engine IIRC.

In fact I know there not I've drove both. You have to rev fook outa the newer gine. And there is no power through out the rev range. Putting your foot down just creates noise and uses fuel.

If ya gunna get a VAG get an older TDi like a mk3 golf B4 passat ect.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#18
Is it that bad? The mk3 had a pretty decent lump of low-down torque and was pretty good on juice, 30mpg round town and 45mpg on a run which isn't bad for an old 2.0 8 valve really...

You sure it's a different engine? The power output and capacity are the same.
[Image: tapatalk_1427020983519_zpsnwvozlhb.jpeg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#19
Think the old engine is ADY and the newer is APK. Tbh it probably the same engine with more sensors ect on. I drove my mates vento 2.0 8v it was much better than the Bora 2.0 8v faster quieter smoother less revs to get it move.

I used to get 35mpg on a run 21-25mpg round an about.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#20
The only mk4's that are worth getting are

The AUQ engine code 180bhp only found in the anniversary edition

The v6 4motion with 212 bhp

And the r32 any other mk4 is utterly useless
Reply
Thanks given by:


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  1.9 Dturbo 205 vs pd mk2 golf pugtk 11 2,852 14-07-2017, 06:13 AM
Last Post: Danny Wideboy
  xud van vs golf gti 1.8 t xudlingo 30 6,279 21-09-2015, 12:58 PM
Last Post: xudlingo
  Anyone play golf? THE_Liam 25 12,211 19-07-2015, 10:45 AM
Last Post: THE_Liam

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)