11-06-2012, 05:11 AM
Hmm, I know why you're doing it liam, as I've really been considering it myself, but its 6 of one or half a dozen of the other I think. I either get a much slower car which is cheaper on insurance, but costs more to fuel and tax....or keep the car that's averaging 63mpg atm, with twice the stock hdi power, and only only 115 a year to tax.....BUT costs fecking loads to insure, just seems like you can't win really. 
The funny thing is, for its lack of power, the nad costs almost the same to fuel (few pence in it over a tank) and more to tax. 
so its gonna have to go soon.........fancy a NAD liam? 
The funny thing is, for its lack of power, the nad costs almost the same to fuel (few pence in it over a tank) and more to tax. so its gonna have to go soon.........fancy a NAD liam?
