29-06-2016, 11:10 AM
(This post was last modified: 29-06-2016, 11:16 AM by Rippthrough.)
Well, I had this chat with a family member yesterday about taking back control and not having the human rights laws pressed on us - he went pretty quiet when I mention WE wrote all those laws, the EU just makes sure they're adhered to, and as a result, should we actually leave, they will be written into our own laws anyway. So you will still have the same laws about kicking out prisoners, etc. What you will probably loose is the law the conservatives don't currently want anyway - so that would be the ones on your maximum consecutive working hours and batches...some people are in for a BIG shock.
I've nothing to say on the second as the accounts obviously balanced out must lower than £350m with some simple math, athough we will be up a bit as we contributed more, the damage to the economy means that's got eaten up straight away anyway.
As for the third - what exactly did people expect them to do about immigration? The ones here legally generally are no issue apart from them not being diversified enough rather than bunched together - which is what creates the subcultures and distrust - that's a council and overly PC arseholes issue, not an immigration one.
The ones that are here already are here to stay anyway. They're not suddenly disappearing overnight.
The immigrants that are here illegally that generally are the ones causing issues and they are the ones we can't control at the minute anyway, so we sure as hell ain't going to stop them once France just merrily lets them get on whatever ferry, rib or truck they like.
Besides that, leaving the EU doesn't mean we'd close our borders anyway - 95% sure that we'd stay in the trading block, and that still means paying the EU money and it still means rights of free travel across European borders. Sorry.
As I said before, anyone that voted purely on the factors of immigration without considering the other myriad of reasons to stay or leave the EU proper, needed their head checking.
I've nothing to say on the second as the accounts obviously balanced out must lower than £350m with some simple math, athough we will be up a bit as we contributed more, the damage to the economy means that's got eaten up straight away anyway.
As for the third - what exactly did people expect them to do about immigration? The ones here legally generally are no issue apart from them not being diversified enough rather than bunched together - which is what creates the subcultures and distrust - that's a council and overly PC arseholes issue, not an immigration one.
The ones that are here already are here to stay anyway. They're not suddenly disappearing overnight.
The immigrants that are here illegally that generally are the ones causing issues and they are the ones we can't control at the minute anyway, so we sure as hell ain't going to stop them once France just merrily lets them get on whatever ferry, rib or truck they like.
Besides that, leaving the EU doesn't mean we'd close our borders anyway - 95% sure that we'd stay in the trading block, and that still means paying the EU money and it still means rights of free travel across European borders. Sorry.
As I said before, anyone that voted purely on the factors of immigration without considering the other myriad of reasons to stay or leave the EU proper, needed their head checking.
Custom roll cages/shiny suspension bits/general fabrication work undertaken, PM me.
Top engine mount repair/reinforcement/chocking for cracked chassis and high powered cars, drive in, drive out, 2 hour turnaround.
Top engine mount repair/reinforcement/chocking for cracked chassis and high powered cars, drive in, drive out, 2 hour turnaround.