Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 306 . . . .
#12
Connor Wrote:Its in calne, get puglove to go have a look lol and as cwspellowololol says, the 2.1 is quite a bit torquey than the 1.9

They are also shit and don't rev anything like the 1.9 though, not worth the hassle at all IMO, tune a 1.9 properly and they are far better engines!
Team Orange Engine Bay

My flickr photostream - http://www.flickr.com/photos/markairey
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
2.1 306 . . . . - by Mattcheese31 - 19-03-2012, 09:36 PM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by Daniel306 - 19-03-2012, 09:42 PM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by 1616six - 19-03-2012, 10:02 PM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by Ben - 19-03-2012, 10:03 PM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by Ed Doe - 19-03-2012, 10:04 PM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by kingy - 19-03-2012, 10:06 PM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by cwspellowe - 19-03-2012, 10:11 PM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by silverzx - 19-03-2012, 10:20 PM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by Mattcheese31 - 19-03-2012, 11:35 PM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by Connor - 20-03-2012, 12:47 AM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by devils_fuel - 30-03-2012, 09:52 AM
Re: 2.1 306 . . . . - by mark_airey - 30-03-2012, 09:58 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)