10-12-2014, 09:33 AM
(09-12-2014, 06:00 PM)toseland Wrote: yeah cause that's more environmentally friendly... instead of just hydrocarbons being burnt you get all sorts of shit and chemicals from landfil..... Genius
how about we just focus on the major shipping on the oceans, contributing as much as 45% of the total per mile CO2 yearly
how about we then look at the fact that DARPA have developed a viable way to use seawater as a fuel..
If you think shipping is bad (granted, it is) then you should see the numbers regarding the amount of methane being produced (which is far far worse than CO2) by the agriculture business as a direct result of the shit tonne of meat everyone consumes. But you won't see anyone campaigning about that

![[Image: Ty8kl7b.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/Ty8kl7b.jpg)