11-12-2012, 02:04 PM
(11-12-2012, 07:37 AM)cwspellowe Wrote: Jeez think of all the fuel wasted on those runs, unless he took them just as he happened to be pulling onto a motorway each time on purpose on a meaningful drive?
Well where else do you think I'd be doing it? I don't just randomly go out to do 30-70s lol.
(11-12-2012, 11:58 AM)Mr Whippy Wrote:(10-12-2012, 05:59 PM)Toms306 Wrote:(10-12-2012, 04:23 PM)Mr Whippy Wrote: If the Pro_Steve one is 125bhp, then yours looks like a 125bhp remap too going on the acceleration which looks the same between the two... if anything yours looks marginally faster between 60-70mph too (so maybe even more powerful than the other car at the usual 4000rpm power peak in a non-fmic HDi)
I'd say that is well within the reasonable range for a ~125bhp remap on an Estate any way. Nothing to worry about.
Dave
Mine should be faster, Rowells with the PS125 had no MAF!If they look the same surely something is wrong?
No MAF doesn't really impact the performance that much outright (ie, full throttle)
In any case, doing the numbers in my little simulator thingy your figures are about right irrespective of Rowells.
Ie, he might have been slightly down hill. You slightly up-hill. Comparing videos is not really reliable so I wouldn't gauge your performance on his video too much
If you are still in doubt then ask your tuner and I'm sure they'll advise what could be wrong or reassure you etc etc... check over diagnostic run logs to rule out some possible problems with you etc.
Cheers
Dave
I am asking my tuner.
The vids were taken in the same place btw, both by myself. But I know theres obviously differences in air pressure/temperature/humidity etc which I guess will change things.
What does the MAF actually affect then? If you can run without one fine, and it doesn't affect full throttle either then what's it for? If its basically for mpg on part throttle then that could be my issue?
On an eco run this week I didn't even manage 50mpg, it's better when I hoon it about lol!
