Posts: 5,205
Threads: 91
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
83
Location: Oxfordshire/Cornwall
Car Model/Spec: Moonstone DT/Volvo V50
Thanks: 2
Given 41 thank(s) in 41 post(s)
The answer is actually kinda in my post - from what I see its a confusion over airmass rate over time vs the current cylinder charge mass... One goes up as RPMs increase, the other stays constant for the same boost level (ish... Depends on the engine's Volumetric efficiency)
You don't get more accuracy between the 2.0/2.2 sensor, the accuracy is the same - it just enables the OEM to use a physically larger sensor housing whilst keeping the same resolution and compatibility between ECU software variants.
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. 
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.
Posts: 99
Threads: 24
Joined: Nov 2013
Thanks: 6
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Also is the maf and airbox we are discussing out of a 307 hdi or a 2.2 c5?
Posts: 10,864
Threads: 117
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
119
Location: Southampton
Car Model/Spec: 306 HDi and friends
Thanks: 13
Given 106 thank(s) in 106 post(s)
Hold the filters next to each other, iirc the 306 one is slightly wider at the front where the xantia one is a touch longer. The net gain in size is slim to none. If i'm thinking of the right air filter that is.
Posts: 5,205
Threads: 91
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
83
Location: Oxfordshire/Cornwall
Car Model/Spec: Moonstone DT/Volvo V50
Thanks: 2
Given 41 thank(s) in 41 post(s)
It's not necessarily proven, I was just opening discussion about the subject... But then a discussion about the size of Xantia air filters started.
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. 
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.