![]() |
Vnt down the back of the engine - Printable Version +- 306oc - Peugeot 306 Owners Club & Forum (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum) +-- Forum: Engines (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Forum: XUD Section (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: Vnt down the back of the engine (/showthread.php?tid=26552) |
Vnt down the back of the engine - MarkHam - 08-09-2014 Has anyone managed to fit a vnt turbo down the back of the engine instead of a gearbox mount? I think it could be tight for space for the actuator but I may give it a try. Thinking at least a 2260v RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - Piggy - 08-09-2014 Plenty of gt17 and gt20 vnts been done. You wont get a GT2260vnt down there though. Have you considered GTC18 or GTB2056?? Smaller than the GT2260vnt but much more efficient RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - Ruan - 08-09-2014 It'll be very tight. Depends on turbo though, you can fit one down there, but it'll take a lot of playing with to get it in the right location. I did it with my 2052V and Dave did it with a 2260V, but he seriously modified the stock manifold to the point I don't think you could call it a stock manifold! RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - MarkHam - 08-09-2014 Ok thanks. I will have a look out for daves. Basically I have achieved 206bhp with an old waste gate turbo. I was hoping to make just a bit more power and wanted to get more power over the rev range. I am deciding between a gt2560r which I already have but Also considering vnt now. Would the gtb vnts be much benefit over the gt2560r? Cheers I think if I could get my hands on a gtb2260 I would try to make it fit down there. But I won't be cutting any of the car away ![]() RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - darrenjlobb - 08-09-2014 Imo you could fairly easily get any VNT down there 60mm compressor adn below, theres loads of room, you just have to put the turbo / actuator in the right position...Its just a bit of a farce mincing around down there... RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - MarkHam - 08-09-2014 (08-09-2014, 12:11 PM)darrenjlobb Wrote: Imo you could fairly easily get any VNT down there 60mm compressor adn below, theres loads of room, you just have to put the turbo / actuator in the right position...Its just a bit of a farce mincing around down there... I'm going to give it a try. Is going vnt worth the hassle over a wg turbo? RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - Ruan - 08-09-2014 Well, put it this way... A GT2560R won't be on song until past 3200rpm at least. A GT2260V will be on boost by 2600RPM - but you'll be limited by surge. A GTB2260VK with the correct headwork will give you 28lbs of boost by ~2100rpm - again you'll be limited by surge, but the compressors are MUCH more surge resistant. All of which will give you power to >5200RPM if the pump can keep up. Again, with correct headwork, a GTB2260VK is a 300hp turbo if you can deliver the fuel to it at the right time. RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - padge - 08-09-2014 do you own the cherry red 306 on youtube by any chance? RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - Dum-Dum - 08-09-2014 Its tight fitting a big turbo down there but there is space, the problem is fabbing stuff down the back of the bay is such a farce. I'd go for gearbox mounting for the sake of ease. I would definitely go for a big VNT turbo. You get the top end flow exactly the same as the WG turbos you'll be looking at but you also get the low end flow of a much smaller turbo which makes the car far far far more driveable than the WG turbo and IMO for a car thats used daily 10bhp mid range is worth 20bhp top end. RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - MarkHam - 08-09-2014 (08-09-2014, 02:19 PM)padge Wrote: do you own the cherry red 306 on youtube by any chance? Yes lol (08-09-2014, 04:51 PM)Dum-Dum Wrote: Its tight fitting a big turbo down there but there is space, the problem is fabbing stuff down the back of the bay is such a farce. I'd go for gearbox mounting for the sake of ease. Cheers. I just not keen on moving the battery. RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - MarkHam - 08-09-2014 (08-09-2014, 01:46 PM)Ruan Wrote: Well, put it this way... That's the info I was after. Cheers RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - padge - 08-09-2014 was the video just td04 @ 40psi? RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - MarkHam - 08-09-2014 (08-09-2014, 07:50 PM)padge Wrote: was the video just td04 @ 40psi? It was an old merc kkk of a e300td RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - Dave - 09-09-2014 ![]() This was a 2260V I was running down the back with no modifications to the chassis at all, apart from the gear linkages which were a simple cut/reweld. This was compound with an oldschool lorry turbo over the gearbox. ![]() This was quite comical as some people couldn't figure out how I could get the big blower to spool so soon ![]() ![]() RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - MarkHam - 09-09-2014 Cheers dave. What power did that thing make RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - zx_volcane - 09-09-2014 (09-09-2014, 02:03 AM)Dave Wrote: Damn Dave, I need to see this thing going on the road again - compound ftmfw RE: Vnt down the back of the engine - anto - 15-09-2014 If moving the battery was the only reason for not doing a gearbox mount turbo then id move the battery. If you want to keep the engine looking stock then go rear mounted. I think id rather have it gearbox mounted cos its such a ballache changing turbos down the back of the engine. |