+- 306oc - Peugeot 306 Owners Club & Forum (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum)
+-- Forum: General (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: The Couch (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Two Mi16x4's (/showthread.php?tid=23635)
Two Mi16x4's - Grant - 28-04-2014
Could be a good project for somebody
Linky
RE: Two Mi16x4's - mcvite - 28-04-2014
Good project for someone if they have the space and time and money,well worth doing.
RE: Two Mi16x4's - 306carter - 28-04-2014
Doubt he will get 2K for them.
Would make a good project though.
RE: Two Mi16x4's - THE_Liam - 28-04-2014
Wrong engine, the 2.0 isn't a patch on the 1.9.
RE: Two Mi16x4's - powerandtorque - 28-04-2014
They'll both be 1.9 Mi16's at that age.
2.0's were on the Phase 2 cars from 1992/K reg onwards and as far as I know there was no 2 litre Mi16x4
RE: Two Mi16x4's - THE_Liam - 28-04-2014
Oh right, I thought it was the other way around, that there were no 2.0 4x4s?
RE: Two Mi16x4's - Matt-Rallye - 28-04-2014
I want a HDi powered 4x4 405 Estate..
Just saying
RE: Two Mi16x4's - powerandtorque - 28-04-2014
(28-04-2014, 03:28 PM)THE_Liam Wrote: Oh right, I thought it was the other way around, that there were no 2.0 4x4s?
All 405 Mi16's were 1.9's upto 1992/K reg.
The 1.9 Mi16x4 engine was basically the same as the regular 2wd model, but the block was slightly different where the rear engine mount attaches (3 holes rather than 4) and the camshafts were slightly longer duration I believe - not personally measured them to confirm that, but that's what the general concensus says and certainly the 205's I've driven or converted using a Mi16x4 engine have sounded a little more "cammy"
As said, I think the Mi16x4 was not carried over to the Phase 2 405's and the 2.0 Mi16 engine, but I'm sure that Welshpug or Miles will confirm that one way or t'other
RE: Two Mi16x4's - puglove - 28-04-2014
mmmm 405 gti6x4 SC .................
RE: Two Mi16x4's - Paul_13 - 28-04-2014
The transfer box will go boom with that power
RE: Two Mi16x4's - ozonehostile - 28-04-2014
Mmmm I want. Getting parts will be an absolute ballache though, even if there is a donar car :-\
Hydrolastic suspension etc
RE: Two Mi16x4's - miles - 28-04-2014
Ticking timebomb, But as said 1.9 Mi4x4 was it, the 2.0 8v made a very brief appearance as a 4x4, I did know of one locally (estate) but it's not got a V5 as it or should have been scrapped
RE: Two Mi16x4's - Rippthrough - 28-04-2014
(28-04-2014, 08:23 PM)ozonehostile Wrote: Hydrolastic suspension etc
Piece of piss to get parts for, I swapped the sphere's on ours a few years back and they were a tenner each.
RE: Two Mi16x4's - ozonehostile - 29-04-2014
(28-04-2014, 08:42 PM)Rippthrough Wrote:(28-04-2014, 08:23 PM)ozonehostile Wrote: Hydrolastic suspension etc
Piece of piss to get parts for, I swapped the sphere's on ours a few years back and they were a tenner each.
Guess it's a similar system to what Citroën use?
4x4 running gear however I guess won't be as easy to come by :-\
RE: Two Mi16x4's - Piggy - 29-04-2014
Ozone...
I can hook you up with help on the suspension...
Dont forget theres a citroen/pug speciliast in hereford, station autos, his name is Tom Newell. He was my yoda
RE: Two Mi16x4's - ozonehostile - 29-04-2014
Good to know haha
However, there's no way I'm buying them, only just about got rid of one pos Breaker