XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Printable Version +- 306oc - Peugeot 306 Owners Club & Forum (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum) +-- Forum: Engines (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Forum: XUD Section (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* (/showthread.php?tid=15608) |
XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - zx_volcane - 22-09-2015 (22-09-2015, 01:03 PM)ADV_93 Wrote: GT2056S @ 38 psi, TMIC, 11mm, WMI - 186 bhp/298 lb/ft Prob would have made good/same power at lower boost and saved the turbo RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Piggy - 22-09-2015 ^^^was what I was thinking tbh RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Chris_90 - 22-09-2015 It had a welded Westgate on it, it was you old turbo piggy that I had then sold atlas RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Jonny81191 - 22-09-2015 Sorry, a welded WG on a GT20?! Did we not learn ages ago that this is a bad idea? RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Piggy - 22-09-2015 Haha! Yeah, recall the lad with the zombie 306 who first tried a GT2056 iirc with a solid wastegate and promptly spat the turbo out the exhaust! RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Mattcheese31 - 22-09-2015 C S Pellow iirc RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - ADV_93 - 23-09-2015 Epic little turbos. Shame theyre made of cheese RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Midnightclub - 23-09-2015 If they're kept at a sensible boost level, they'll last.. what did you expect at nearly 40 psi lol RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Piggy - 23-09-2015 (23-09-2015, 11:35 AM)Midnightclub Wrote: If they're kept at a sensible boost level, they'll last.. what did you expect at nearly 40 psi lol Amen RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - ADV_93 - 23-09-2015 Soz forum RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Jonny81191 - 23-09-2015 Meh, it's your loss. Just seems kind of pointless when it'd still be running and making the same power if you'd done it properly. RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Piggy - 23-09-2015 (23-09-2015, 06:00 PM)Jonny81191 Wrote: Meh, it's your loss. Just seems kind of pointless when it'd still be running and making the same power if you'd done it properly. Hmmm. Was thinking that with a fmic and at say 27/28psi you wouldnt need the WMI to bring temps down at all either. Good effort though lad! Just its not a honest figure in my book as you can only make that figure with that setup once or twice before it will crap itself RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Mattcheese31 - 28-09-2015 Cleaned, please keep on topic chaps, feel free to abuse each other on FB RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - niciou - 05-01-2016 Hello everyone you feel how the power of my car https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkUCkQME5gk RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - 205dtub - 16-01-2016 I'll add mine, from the 205 derv missile. 176.7hp, 247lb/ft - GT2056s @ 23/24psi, FMIC, 9mm Gov and LDA , 2.5" downpipe and exhaust, lightened flywheel, ported head, hdi rods, ARPs. RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - niciou - 28-05-2016 (05-01-2016, 05:29 PM)niciou Wrote: Hello everyone passage au banc : 205 td 2.1 8 s , turbo td04l 15t , 30 psi puissance : 229.4 cv a 4417 tr/min couple : 431. NM RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - niciou - 28-05-2016 (28-05-2016, 01:04 PM)niciou Wrote:(05-01-2016, 05:29 PM)niciou Wrote: Hello everyone test puissance en video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmHHOHt3PK8&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0aciRawA3Y&feature=youtu.be (28-05-2016, 02:01 PM)niciou Wrote:(28-05-2016, 01:04 PM)niciou Wrote:(05-01-2016, 05:29 PM)niciou Wrote: Hello everyone passage au banc zx td - niciou - 21-01-2017 Hi everybody Passage to the bench ZX td Turbo t2-t25 pressure 1.6 bar Fmic HDI box Pump 11mm 169 cv 326 N-M XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - bashbarnard - 21-01-2017 (21-01-2017, 01:40 PM)niciou Wrote: Salut a tous What power did it make then?? RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - niciou - 21-01-2017 (21-01-2017, 02:03 PM)bashbarnard Wrote:(21-01-2017, 01:40 PM)niciou Wrote: Salut a tous Sorry i try to put the sheet of the passage to the bench i can not get there 169 cv 326 N-M XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - bashbarnard - 21-01-2017 Not a bad result that for an old turbo which is essentially bolt on job Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: passage au banc zx td - niciou - 13-03-2017 (21-01-2017, 01:40 PM)niciou Wrote: Hi everybody RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - bashbarnard - 25-09-2017 Thread tidied up. Tom (zx_volcane) is right. Thread is for rr figures. RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Paul_13 - 21-10-2017 1.9 xud Td04 & 11mm pump. Harsh lda grind 35+ psi RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - zx_volcane - 21-10-2017 (21-10-2017, 04:38 PM)Paul_13 Wrote: 1.9 xud boom! RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - Paul_13 - 21-10-2017 In many ways XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - bashbarnard - 22-10-2017 Good result man. Must go like a rocket in that thing Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - 399road - 25-10-2017 A great result, just hoping it lasts. Mine did 170 horse at a safe 20 psi. Don't really want to risk much more boost on mine as it's fast with 20 psi. Yours must be a right monster. Well done. RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - niciou - 15-08-2019 first try at 2.5 bar loose clutch RE: XUD RR results *THE BIBLE* - ekjdm14 - 29-07-2020 Hoping to add our 206DT to this list soon, got to sort a cooling fan and book in with a local company but I'm expecting (hoping for) 160+bhp from butt-dyno measurements from-: Square-port D8A stock Xantia engine mileage unknown, K14 @ 25psi, Xantia FMIC, Mix of Xantia and home fabricated hard pipes, Open turbo elbow currently but may go to 2.25" straight pipe, 9mm Bosch gov'd and LDA ground 'til I got scared it'd snap, 206 GTi180 flywheel, Running 100% Sunflower oil Will report back when I actually have paperwork, even if it's embarrassing as feck! EDIT- well I spoke too soon, K14 is dead, oversped the feck out of it (27psi-ish @ about 4700rpm with small boost leak from intake mani') and blew the turbine apart! Soon to be replaced with a GT2052V along with better manifold sealing. Hopefully be a better match for the kind of power we're after & if I get the VNT actuation just right should be a bit easier on the standard head bolts. |